Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 7 authors, 2012-12-28

[PATCH 4/4] clk: zynq: Use of_init_clk_data()

From: monstr@monstr.eu (Michal Simek)
Date: 2012-12-28 15:11:55
Also in: lkml

2012/12/21 Josh Cartwright [off-list ref]:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:28:10PM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwright at ni.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:54 PM
To: Stephen Boyd; Michal Simek
Cc: Soren Brinkmann; Mike Turquette; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: zynq: Use of_init_clk_data()

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:30:21PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
On 12/19/12 11:22, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
[..]
quoted
quoted
A probably unique thing I do is, I set the status of uart0 to
disabled. This way I can reuse my rootfs which does not run getty on
ttyPS1. And this worked fine before.
Thanks for testing. It seems that clocks are failing to register.
Please try this patch.

--->8-----
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
index 2be22a2..2734715 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
@@ -948,9 +948,9 @@ static int xuartps_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct clk *clk;

        clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
-       if (!clk) {
-               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no clock specified\n");
-               return -ENODEV;
+       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n");
+               return PTR_ERR(clk);
        }

        rc = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
Yes, indeed.

As a side note, this is introduced in my patch "serial: xilinx_uartps:
get clock rate info from dts", which is in xilinx/arm-next (and thus in linux-next),
but as far as I can tell, didn't ever make it into the arm-soc tree.

Michal, did you have plans for pushing this through arm-soc?
I have had this patch in my devel branch for a while.
It is in arm-next tree right now and I will provide path to mainline.
Will you be rolling in Stephen's suggestions, or should he/I cook up a
patch on top with the fix in place?
Here is the patch I have applied.

http://git.xilinx.com/?p=linux-xlnx.git;a=commit;h=a3607ea56f4455c515201ab91d2304a634925f6c
It probably makes sense to pull the quoted fix above directly into the
patch before it hits mainline, and we can change the use of of_clk_get
as a patch on top.  Thoughts?
Stephen: Can you please tell me how do you want to add these patches
to mainline?
Through arm-soc tree? Have you asked for pulling?

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help