On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 16:10:04, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On 12/5/2012 6:13 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 17:33:37, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
quoted
Hi Avinash,
On 11/29/2012 5:16 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
quoted
Update number of errors using nand ecc strength.
Also add macro definitions BCH8_ERROR_MAX & BCH4_ERROR_MAX
Can you please describe why the original method of setting nerrors was
incorrect? Was it causing any issues in any particular configuration?
It affects the reusability of the code. For example BCH8 with AM335x RBL
compatibility requires 14 bytes instead of 13 byte. So setting nerrors
with
nerrors = (info->nand.ecc.bytes == 13) ? 8 : 4;
will break am335x RBL compatibility.
This should be summarized in the patch description so the motivation is
clear to those who read the history later.
Ok I will add the details in patch description in next version.
Thanks
Avinash
Thanks,
Sekhar