[PATCH 1/1] asix: use ramdom hw addr if the one read is not valid
From: bjorn@mork.no (Bjørn Mork)
Date: 2012-11-22 08:55:30
Also in:
netdev
Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] writes:
On 11/21/2012 01:22 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Cc: linux-usb at vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c index 33ab824..7ebec5b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c@@ -225,7 +225,13 @@ static int ax88172_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf) ret); goto out; } - memcpy(dev->net->dev_addr, buf, ETH_ALEN); + + if (is_valid_ether_addr(buf)) { + memcpy(dev->net->dev_addr, buf, ETH_ALEN); + } else { + netdev_info(dev->net, "invalid hw address, using random\n"); + eth_hw_addr_random(dev->net); + } /* Initialize MII structure */ dev->mii.dev = dev->net;
[..]
Repeated thrice, this asks to be put into subroutine...
Yes. Looking at the driver, this probably goes for most of the three _bind() functions. There is a lot of common code there. But more important wrt the eth_hw_addr_random() change: Does this actually work with real devices? The driver implements a asix_set_mac_address() which writes the address back to the device when you change it. I assume there is a reason for doing that. Why don't you do it here? Bj?rn