Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2013-02-01
STALE4923d

[PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Broadcast frequency change notifications for all cores

From: Tomasz Figa <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-21 21:23:02
Also in: linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc

Hi Rafael,

On Wednesday 21 of November 2012 21:47:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 02:52:26 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday 13 of November 2012 10:26:12 Tomasz Figa wrote:
quoted
On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so
changing
frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.

This patch modifies the exynos-cpufreq driver to inform cpufreq core
about this behavior and broadcast frequency change notifications for
all cores.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---

 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index af2d81e..c0d54a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy, }

 	arm_volt = volt_table[index];

-	cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+	for_each_cpu(freqs.cpu, policy->cpus)
+		cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

 	/* When the new frequency is higher than current frequency */
 	if ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && !safe_arm_volt) {
@@ -115,7 +116,8 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy, if (freqs.new != freqs.old)

 		exynos_info->set_freq(old_index, index);

-	cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+	for_each_cpu(freqs.cpu, policy->cpus)
+		cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

 	/* When the new frequency is lower than current frequency */
 	if ((freqs.new < freqs.old) ||
@@ -235,6 +237,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy) cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus,
cpu_possible_mask);

 		cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
 	
 	} else {

+		policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;

 		cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 	
 	}
Ping.
Am I supposed to handle this?
I guess. Would be really nice if you could apply this patch for 3.8.

Best regards,
Tomasz Figa
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help