On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:43:32PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
+ iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
+ delay = 1;
+ while ((iicstat & S3C2410_IICSTAT_START) &&
+ ktime_us_delta(now, start) < S3C2410_IDLE_TIMEOUT) {
+ usleep_range(delay, 2 * delay);
+ if (delay < S3C2410_IDLE_TIMEOUT / 10)
+ delay <<= 1;
+ now = ktime_get();
+ iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
+ }
- /* first, try busy waiting briefly */
- do {
- cpu_relax();
- iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
- } while ((iicstat & S3C2410_IICSTAT_START) && --spins);
On the hardware I was using when I wrote the original code here we were
hitting 1-2 spins often enough to be interesting - starting off with a
direct busy wait was definitely useful when doing large batches of I/O,
especially compared to sleeps which might cause us to schedule.
- /* if that timed out sleep */
- if (!spins) {
- msleep(1);
- iicstat = readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICSTAT);
- }
It seems like it'd be better to do the exponential backoff bit here
instead of removing the busy wait completely.