alignment faults in 3.6

"David Laight" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

It might be enough to use __attribute__((aligned(2))) on some structure
members (actually does 'ldm' need 8 byte alignment?? - in which case
aligned(4) is enough).

The aligned attribute can only increase alignment.

Not true.
If you have:

struct foo {
    short   a;
    int     b __attribute__((aligned(2)));
    short   c;
};

You'll find sizeof (struct foo) is 8, and that, on arm/sparc etc,
gcc will generate 2 16bit accesses (and shifts) for foo.b;

That is not what the manual says.  Quoting:

     When used on a struct, or struct member, the `aligned' attribute
     can only increase the alignment

My gcc agrees with the manual:

$ cat foo.c
struct foo {
    short a;
    int b __attribute__((aligned(2)));
    short c;
};

int foo(struct foo *f)
{
    return f->b;
}
$ arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.7.2 -O2 -o- -S foo.c
        .text
        .align  2
        .global foo
        .type   foo, %function
foo:
        ldr     r0, [r0, #4]
        bx      lr

(compiler output edited for clarity)

This clearly says the 'b' member resides at an offset of 4 bytes into
the struct.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com