[PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC
From: Michal Simek <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-27 13:59:21
Also in:
lkml
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwright at ni.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:05 PM To: arm at kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; John Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC This makes the definition of VMALLOC_END suitable for use within assembly code. This is necessary to allow the use of VMALLOC_END in defining where the early uart is mapped for use with DEBUG_LL. Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <redacted> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h index 08c1231..72904a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ */ #define VMALLOC_OFFSET (8*1024*1024) #define VMALLOC_START (((unsigned long)high_memory +VMALLOC_OFFSET) & ~(VMALLOC_OFFSET-1)) -#define VMALLOC_END 0xff000000UL +#define VMALLOC_END _AC(0xff000000,UL)
This shouldn't be the part of this series but should go to mainline through different tree. Arnd, Olof: Can you take this patch to your arm-soc tree? I don't think it is a good workstyle to propose it to mainline through zynq soc tree. What do you think? Thanks, Michal