Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2012-10-24

[PATCH 1/1] mmc: Standardise capability type

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-24 14:53:15
Also in: linux-mmc, lkml

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities
are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them
to elevate any confusion.

Cc: Chris Ball <redacted>
Cc: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
Why make it "unsigned long" then? I think that adds to the
confusion because it's sometimes 32 bits and sometimes 64 bits,
depending on the CPU. Since it's a bitmask, I would suggest
using u32 to make the size explicit.
I'm not sure that it leaves any confusion. It perhaps wastes a little
space on 64bit architectures, but that also applies to a great deal
of other bitmasks floating around.

I can do it if you feel that passionate about it, but it's a bigger
job to hunt down all occurrences and change them over. I only felt
strongly enough about it to craft this patch because I noticed the
inconsistency as I created new populate caps for OF functionality.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help