Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 7 authors, 2012-10-23

[PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Defer probe if regulator_get fails

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-23 17:07:43
Also in: linux-mmc, linux-tegra, lkml

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:29:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/23/2012 01:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
quoted
Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC supplies? Or are
we just deferring the probe indefinitely there?
quoted
For boards that power MMC unconditionally, are we supposed to add dummy
regulators to make them work with this patchset?
I believe that dummy (fixed) regulators are supposed to be provided in
all cases where the platform doesn't actually have one. The fact that
everything worked OK without them before this patch was most likely a
mistake/accident.
That's the general idea; clearly there *are* supplies here, they're just
not software controlled supplies.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121023/e239279e/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help