On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/18/2012 04:01 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
This switches the way that pins are reserved for multiplexing:
The conceptual change makes perfect sense to me.
Thanks...
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
quoted
void pinmux_free_setting(struct pinctrl_setting const *setting)
...
quoted
+ /*
+ * If a setting is active, disable it so that all pins are released
+ */
+ pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
"*If* a setting is active ..." implies there should be a C if statement
here to check if the setting is actually active before trying to disable it?
Spot on.
Actually in core.c we're already checking this:
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
if (state == p->state)
pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
pinmux_free_setting(setting);
break;
So this is just buggy driving the refcount down to negative.
(I think Jean-Nicolas noticed this phenomenon...)
I should just delete pinmux_free_setting().
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Yours,
Linus Walleij