On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
As there will be a Device Tree created for the UIBs, there is no
need to call the UIB initiation functions. Each device will be
detailed and registered from the Device Tree instead.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
Acked-by, but...
quoted
- .init_late = ux500_init_late,
+ .init_late = NULL,
Why even define it?
More to show that we're _intentionally_ not using it.
I'm happy to remove if it offends you? :)
No, I was just asking. I did ACK it...
Thanks,
Linus Walleij