GCC 4.6.x miscompiling arm-linux?
From: David Jander <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-11 09:31:39
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:48:53 +0200 Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:27:53AM +0200, David Jander wrote:quoted
Hi Matt,quoted
@ Function supports interworking. @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 @ link register save eliminated. cmp r0, #9 mov r3, #0 str r3, [r1, #0] mov r0, #0 strgt r3, [r1, #4] bx lr .size flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.3" .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits I think this looks correct. Perhaps you could try the angstrom arm5te toolchain and see if it's a toolchain issue?Yes, this looks a lot better, and is exactly what I get when I compile this code with CodeSourcery GCC-4.4.1 I have tries building gcc-4.6.3 also with OSELAS/PTXdist, and it gives the same (wrong) result as with gcc-4.6.2AFAIK our OSELAS/PTXdist Toolchains use Linaro patches, this would explain why both have the same result.
It would indeed, if I had just used OSELAS as-is, but I didn't ;-)
I made a copy of
arm-v5te-linux-gnueabi_gcc-4.6.2_glibc-2.14.1_binutils-2.21.1a_kernel-2.6.39-sanitized.ptxconfig
and replaced the version string 4.6.2 with 4.6.3. AFAIK, this way PTXdist will
download pristine gcc-4.6.3 sources and not apply any patches, since there is
no directory named patches/gcc-4.6.3, right? Can I assume that I have an
unpatched version of gcc-4.6.3 then?
Btw, Here's what I get from it:
flexcan_chip_start:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
mov r3, #0
cmp r0, #9
str r3, [r1, #0]
ldrle r3, [r1, #4]
mov r0, #0
str r3, [r1, #4]
bx lr
.size flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start
.ident "GCC: (OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.11.1) 4.6.3"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
Wrong code.
See the version string? It is clearly not an existing OSELAS version.
Best regards,
--
David Jander
Protonic Holland.