[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: delay: set loops_per_jiffy when moving to timer-based loop · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-08-29
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-08-29
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Stephen Boyd <hidden> · 2012-08-30
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-09-04
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-09-04
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Stephen Boyd <hidden> · 2012-09-04
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-09-04
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources · Will Deacon <hidden> · 2012-09-07
[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: delay: set loops_per_jiffy when moving to timer-based loop · Stephen Boyd <hidden> · 2012-08-30

STALE5081d

[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 10:44:03

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:07:50AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:51:25AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

quoted

+void __init register_current_timer_delay(struct delay_timer *timer)

const?

Sure. I'll send an updated patch.

Gah, spoke too soon. This isn't going to work, as the frequency may not be
known until probe time (for example, it could be obtained by the device
tree) so const data isn't going to cut it.

Will