On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 06:14:44, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:20:57PM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
quoted
+ if (dev->version == MCASP_VERSION_3) {
+ mcasp_clr_bits(dev->base + MCASP_VER3_RFIFOCTL,
FIFO_ENABLE);
- mcasp_set_bits(dev->base + DAVINCI_MCASP_RFIFOCTL,
+ mcasp_set_bits(dev->base + MCASP_VER3_RFIFOCTL,
FIFO_ENABLE);
+ } else {
+ mcasp_clr_bits(dev->base +
+ DAVINCI_MCASP_RFIFOCTL, FIFO_ENABLE);
+ mcasp_set_bits(dev->base +
+ DAVINCI_MCASP_RFIFOCTL, FIFO_ENABLE);
+ }
This is all basically OK but it seems like it'd be better if all these
dev->version checks were switch statements. That way when the hardware
designers get bored and add version 4 of the register map it'll slot in
naturally, and it'll be more clear what the code currently handles.
Ok I will update this. Since 3/3 is already accepted & I don?t see any reviews
for 2/3, I will only resend this patch (1/3). Is it ok?
Regards,
Gururaja