rcu self-detected stall messages on OMAP3, 4 boards
From: paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley)
Date: 2012-09-22 18:42:10
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
From: paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley)
Date: 2012-09-22 18:42:10
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Could you please point me to a recipe for creating a minimal userspace? Just in case it is the userspac erather than the architecture/hardware that makes the difference.
Tony's suggestion is pretty good. Note that there may also be differences in kernel timers -- either between x86 and ARM architectures, or loaded device drivers -- that may confound the problem.
Just to make sure I understand the combinations: o All stalls have happened when running a minimal userspace. o CONFIG_NO_HZ=n suppresses the stalls. o CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ (which depends on CONFIG_NO_HZ=y) has no observable effect on the stalls. Did I get that right, or am I missing a combination?
That's correct.
Indeed, rcu_idle_gp_timer_func() is a bit strange in that it is cancelled upon exit from idle, and therefore should (almost) never actually execute. Its sole purpose is to wake up the CPU. ;-)
Right. Just curious, what would wake up the kernel from idle to handle a grace period expiration when CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=n? On a very idle system, the time between timer ticks could potentially be several tens of seconds. - Paul