[PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches
From: Felipe Balbi <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-16 18:41:08
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-serial, lkml
Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:22:01AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:quoted
The bad news is that N800 no longer boots -- or the UART dies during serial init: http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_tty_next_e36851d0/20120910020323/boot/2420n800/2420n800_log.txt The problem doesn't seem to affect the 2430SDP. Could you put together a patch to fix N800?Bisected this down. It's this one that causes the problem on N800: commit 93220dcc3052182e7156c09655ad1316055564b9 Author: Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] Date: Thu Sep 6 15:45:27 2012 +0300 serial: omap: set dev->drvdata before enabling pm_runtime by the time we call our first pm_runtme_get_sync() after enable pm_runtime, our resume method might be called. To avoid problems, we must make sure that our dev->drvdata is set correctly before our resume method gets called. Tested-by: Shubhrajyoti D [off-list ref] Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref]
Interesting. That simply moves platform_set_drvdata() to a saner location... The only way for this to cause problems is if we're trying to restore a context which was never saved. Is there a way to prevent runtime_resume() to be called during probe() if I know the HW is already enabled ? Maybe with pm_runtime_set_active() ? -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120916/4687d1c4/attachment.sig>