On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:48:20PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Monday 10 September 2012, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Monday 10 September 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:53:39AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

I think a bunch of other architectures can have relocatable kernels, which
is useful e.g. for kdump. It does imply a small runtime cost and may have
other disadvantages though.

Relocatable in physical space is what kdump actually needs, and that's 
what we already have here (as well as on ARM32 for that matter with 
CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT).  Relocatable in the virtual space is costly 
and we shouldn't need to go there.

Ah, I see. I thought that the other architectures (powerpc and x86)
doing this were actually building with -fPIC, but they do the same
kind of early patching that we do.

On arm64 I don't have run-time code patching (yet) but a PHYS_OFFSET
variable set at boot time. It may prove useful to have run-time code
patching but that's just an optimisation that can be added later.

-- 
Catalin