[PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-10 00:39:33
Also in:
linux-m68k, lkml
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:15:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
Note that the patch system doesn't always return error messages anymore (it used to do that reliably, but as it's now a favourite target for spammers and was creating soo much backscatter, which was then filling my mailbox with bounces... that had to change.)Hrm, that's not ideal. It'd be nice if it were able to do something like always reply if there were patch contents, or if it found things like the KernelVersion line in there. Obviously e-mail is also not time guaranteed so deciding it's not responded (and then working out why it did that) is going to be unreliable too.
It tries to - if it finds what it thinks is a patch in the right place in the email. If it doesn't think it found a patch then it won't reply. In other words, if you include a patch without a PATCH FOLLOWS or the --- commit message/diffstat break marker preceding it, it will ignore you.
I do recall seeing the patch in the database but it's not showing up any more so perhaps I was thinking of a different patch.
Well, no patch ever gets deleted from the database... the only way even I can do that is to manually issue the SQL.
OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch tracker or something which made me wonder if things had changed.
I kind'a forgot because it's been soo long since I took any of those patches...