[PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 14:25:12
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 04:43:31PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
+{
if (clk->ops->unprepare)
clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);
- __clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
+ if (clk != top)
+ __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
+}
The __clk_unprepare does not match the __clk_prepare below in terms of
if we should call clk->ops->prepare/unprepare on top clock.
I have to change __clk_unprepare to something like the below to get
the series work on imx6q.
void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
{
+ if (clk == top)
+ return;
+
if (clk->ops->unprepare)
clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);
- if (clk != top)
- __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
+ __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
}
+int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (clk != top) {
+ ret = __clk_prepare(clk->parent, top);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (clk->ops->prepare) {
ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk->hw);
if (ret) {
- __clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
+ /* this is safe since clk != top */
+ __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
return ret;
}
}
}
- clk->prepare_count++;
-
return 0;
}-- Regards, Shawn