On Thursday 30 August 2012 05:45 AM, Turquette, Mike wrote:

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Rajendra Nayak[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
index d7f55e4..a3831a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c

@@ -3156,6 +3156,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = {
         CLK(NULL,       "dss_tv_clk",&dss_tv_clk,    CK_443X),
         CLK(NULL,       "dss_48mhz_clk",&dss_48mhz_clk, CK_443X),
         CLK(NULL,       "dss_dss_clk",&dss_dss_clk,   CK_443X),
+       CLK(NULL,       "dss_fck",&dss_fck,       CK_443X),
         CLK("omapdss_dss",      "ick",&dss_fck,       CK_443X),

Is it right to re-use dss_fck for the "ick" here?  I think it is due
to omap4 modulemode stuff but I don't have DM in front of me and
wanted a double-check...

yes, its because of the wierdness of DSS clocks where a so-called
optional clock is actually a function clock.

Regards,
Mike