[PATCH 4/9] ARM: pmu: remove arm_pmu_type enumeration
From: Jon Hunter <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-20 13:05:20
On 08/20/2012 04:01 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:quoted
Hi Will, Tony,Hi Jon [adding Arnd],quoted
On 08/10/2012 12:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index c00c689..02b9478 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ #include <mach/irqs.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <asm/mach/map.h> -#include <asm/pmu.h> #include "iomap.h" #include <plat/board.h>@@ -448,7 +447,7 @@ static struct resource omap3_pmu_resource = { static struct platform_device omap_pmu_device = { .name = "arm-pmu", - .id = ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU, + .id = -1, .num_resources = 1, };I know that I have already ack-ed the change and it is fine with me, however, I see a potential merge conflict here with my patch [1] (assuming that these all go into v3.7) where I am moving the above structure.Are your patches queued anywhere other than your tree? If not, then I could ask Arnd to pull the perf changes into their own branch in arm-soc and you could rebase onto that.
No just my tree for now, so that would work for me.
quoted
For testing I have rebased my series on top of this series and it is working well so far on OMAP4460.Great, thanks. Can I add your tested-by to the patches please?
Yes, you can add my tested-by. I will also test on omap3 and omap4430 too. Cheers Jon