[PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:

From: Ludovic Desroches <redacted>

Hello,

I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.

In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
receive into the patches when you resend them.  Thanks!

I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
documented and it will concern all drivers.

Agreed.  It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.

Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
isn't it?

Yes, let's do that.  I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [off-list ref]   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

Le 08/08/2012 05:14 AM, Chris Ball a ?crit :

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:

quoted

From: Ludovic Desroches <redacted>

Hello,

I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.

In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
receive into the patches when you resend them.  Thanks!

Ok.

quoted

I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
documented and it will concern all drivers.

Agreed.  It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.

quoted

Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
isn't it?

Yes, let's do that.  I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.

Thanks Chris.

Ludovic

Thanks,

- Chris.