Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-08-09
STALE5048d
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v5 current

[PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

From: Chris Ball <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-08 03:14:23
Also in: linux-mmc

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
From: Ludovic Desroches <redacted>

Hello,

I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
receive into the patches when you resend them.  Thanks!
I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
documented and it will concern all drivers.
Agreed.  It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.
Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
isn't it?
Yes, let's do that.  I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [off-list ref]   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help