Hi,
On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
From: Ludovic Desroches <redacted>
Hello,
I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.
In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
receive into the patches when you resend them. Thanks!
I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
documented and it will concern all drivers.
Agreed. It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.
Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
isn't it?
Yes, let's do that. I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball [off-list ref] <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child