[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) · 2012-07-25
[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions · zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) · 2012-07-25
[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-04
[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions · haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) · 2012-08-05
[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-05
[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions · haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) · 2012-08-05
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) · 2012-07-25
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) · 2012-07-25
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) · 2012-07-25
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-04
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · Igor Grinberg <hidden> · 2012-08-05
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) · 2012-08-05
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · Igor Grinberg <hidden> · 2012-08-06
[PATCH 1/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: simplify pxa_gpio_to_irq() and pxa_irq_to_chip() · arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) · 2012-08-06

STALE5147d

[PATCH 2/2] GPIO: gpio-pxa: fix devicetree functions

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-04 23:16:20

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Mack [off-list ref] wrote:

Provide an of_xlate function for the PXA GPIO chips and make it work for
devicetree environments.

Successfully tested on a PXA3xx board.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>

Could the PXA maintainers pls have a look at this patch, if you're working
on DT support especially...

BTW: I guess this is not a fix for issues in the current kernel HEAD?
Is it OK to have this for the next (v3.7) cycle?

Yours,
Linus Walleij