[PATCH 5/8] mfd: Provide the PRCMU with its own IRQ domain
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-20 12:55:39
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:10:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:36:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:44:37PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
quoted
Yes but I think I saw this other patch set from Lee, hitting irqdomain, OF and MFD to actually fix this ... or did I get it wrong?quoted
No, you're not wrong.quoted
Historically (in my patches) xb8500_irq_get_virq() was used by drivers to obtain a VIRQ when not using Device Tree. Now the MFD core handles conversion there is little requirement for it. In fact there are no more users for db8500_irq_get_virq() and only one user for ab8500_irq_get_virq() and that's itself. I guess we can rid them and call irq_get_mapping() directly instead.Oh dear. Unfortunately whoever added this support to the MFD core did so in such a manner that it's only supported for device tree systems and only for devices which express the MFD cells as device tree nodes which means that most devices can't it - db8500 has got a reasonably unusual combination there.
Right, that was the initial intention. It would be a trivial semantic change if drivers without DT support wished to use the functionality though. However, the only examples I found of a non-DT enabled driver that could make good use of it in order to strip out some cruft would be the Arizona and one of the Samsung drivers, and they each have their own hand-rolled methods of hwirq -> virq conversion now, so any change to support them would result in multiple invocations of irq_create_mapping which would likely cause breakage. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog