Hi Peter,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:15:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 12:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
In other words, I think this should look like this:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
index 580a6d35c7..44a66c99c8 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
@@ -25,8 +25,11 @@
static inline void
__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
{
- if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
- fail_fn(count);
+ if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) {
+ /* Mark lock contention explicitly */
+ if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1))
+ fail_fn(count);
+ }
}
OK, I like this.. Thanks guys! Will will you send a final and complete
patch?
I sent one out on Friday but somehow managed to drop you from CC -- sorry
about that:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1341305
Cheers,
Will