[RESEND PATCH] ARM: Handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page
From: Simon Baatz <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-28 20:55:09
Hi Russel, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:27:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:41:54AM +0200, Simon Baatz wrote:quoted
a while ago I sent the patch above to fix a data corruption problem on VIVT architectures (and probably VIPT aliasing). There has been a bit of discussion with Catalin, but there was no real conclusion on how to proceed. (See http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg176913.html for the original post)Going back to that post: However, this assumption is not true for direct IO or SG_IO (see e.g. [1] and [2]). This is why vgchange fails with mv_cesa as reported by me in [3]. (Btw., flush_kernel_dcache_page is also called from "copy_strings" in fs/exec.c when copying env/arg strings between processes. Thus, its use is not restricted to device drivers.) The calls from copy_strings is not a problem - because the newly allocated pages will have PG_arch_1 clear, and when the page is passed to set_pte(), it will be flushed.
I was not implying that copy_strings has a problem. But, from copy_string's comment: /* * 'copy_strings()' copies argument/environment strings from the old * processes's memory to the new process's stack. ... You said below that flush_kernel_dcache_page() is supposed to be called for page cache pages only. Hmm, in the new process's stack?
We _certainly_ do not want to make flush_kernel_dcache_page() do what you're doing, because it will mean we're over-flushing *all* pages on VIVT caches. Not only will we be flushing them for DMA, but we'll then do it again when flush_kernel_dcache_page() is invoked, and then possibly again when the page eventually ends up being visible to userspace.
Why should flush_kernel_dcache_page() be invoked at all for DMAed pages? If you state that this patch over-flushes *all* pages, I assume that you _certainly_ do not understand the mapping == NULL case. ;-) Can a page in the page cache have page->mapping == NULL? If not page_mapping() only returns NULL in the anon case. I found this strange myself, but this is the way I thought flush_dcache_page() handles this. But now I realized it's probably just a bug in that function, because flush_dcache_page() is not supposed to handle anon pages at all. (However, it flushes the kernel mapping currently, since mapping == NULL for these pages.) If we find out that flush_kernel_dcache_page() needs to handle anonymous pages, it should do this explicitly.
quoted
The case is not hit too often apparently; the ingredients are PIO (like) driver, use of flush_kernel_dcache_page(), and direct I/O.Right, so we need to analyse the direct IO paths and work out whether they're using the flush_* interfaces correctly, and even whether they're using the correct interfaces.
I agree. I am not claiming that my patch is necessarily correct; this is a tangled mess for me. But hey, it got the discussion finally going.
Note that flush_*dcache_page() are supposed to only be concerned with page cache pages, not anonymous pages. flush_anon_page() is all about anonymous pages only.
May be, may be not. From Documentation/cachetlb.txt: void flush_dcache_page(struct page *page) Any time the kernel writes to a page cache page, _OR_ the kernel is about to read from a page cache page and user space shared/writable mappings of this page potentially exist, this routine is called. void flush_kernel_dcache_page(struct page *page) When the kernel needs to modify a user page is has obtained with kmap, it calls this function after all modifications are complete (but before kunmapping it) to bring the underlying page up to date. - Simon