Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2012-07-20
DORMANTno replies

[RFC PATCH v2] ARM: Make a compile firmware conditionally

From: Kyungmin Park <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-20 05:06:05

On 7/20/12, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2012, Kyungmin Park wrote:
quoted
From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Some boards can use the firmware at trustzone but others can't use this.
However we need to build it simultaneously. To address this issue,
introduce arm firmware support and use it at each board files.

e.g., In boot_secondary at mach-exynos/platsmp.c

        __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(exynos4_secondary_startup),
                CPU1_BOOT_REG);

        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_FIRMWARE)) {
                /* Call Exynos specific smc call */
		firmware_ops.cpu_boot(cpu);
        }

        gic_raise_softirq(cpumask_of(cpu), 1);

        if (pen_release == -1)

Now smp_ops is not yet merged, now just call the firmware_init at
init_early
 at board file

e.g., exynos4412 based board

static void __init board_init_early(void)
{
	exynos_firmware_init();
}

TODO
	1. DT support.
	2. call firmware init by smp_ops.

Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Yes, this all looks reasonable to me. One possible idea though:
Thanks, I'll split the patches into generic firmware patch and exynos
specific patch.
quoted
+
+int __init exynos_firmware_init(void)
+{
+	firmware_ops.do_idle = exynos_do_idle;
+	firmware_ops.cpu_boot = exynos_cpu_boot;
+	return 0;
+}
Instead of initializing each field separately, how about copying
the entire data structure and do

static struct firmware_ops exynos_firmware_ops __initdata = {
	.do_idle = exynos_do_idle,
	.cpu_boot = exynos_cpu_boot,
};

void __init exynos_firmware_init(void)
{
	firmware_ops = exynos_firmware_ops;
}
No problem. I'll update it.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help