Device tree binding for DVFS table
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-15 21:40:34
Also in:
linux-fbdev
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:00:14AM +0530, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2012 09:38 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
quoted
About repeating frequencies, operating voltage for a frequency would be the highest one mapped in the table.
This sounds very surprising... that would generally just result in higher power consumption.
quoted
I know this makes reading difficult but it provides flexibility,
Does this explanation help?
The loss of comprehensibility seems like a really major disadvantage for very little practical gain here. Big arrays in DT are already hard enough to read without adding extra complexity on top of that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120715/d6dbc57c/attachment.sig>