[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP: board-4430sdp: MUX configuration for sys_nirq2
From: Kevin Hilman <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-06 14:16:25
Also in:
linux-omap
Peter Ujfalusi [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
The sys_nirq2 is used for twl6040, make sure the pin is configured correctly. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c index c4e17641..72cd206 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c@@ -827,6 +827,9 @@ static void __init omap_4430sdp_display_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX static struct omap_board_mux board_mux[] __initdata = { OMAP4_MUX(USBB2_ULPITLL_CLK, OMAP_MUX_MODE4 | OMAP_PIN_OUTPUT), + /* NIRQ2 for twl6040 */ + OMAP4_MUX(SYS_NIRQ2, OMAP_MUX_MODE0 | + OMAP_PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | OMAP_PIN_OFF_WAKEUPENABLE),
Since this is TWL6030 specific, it should rather be done in TWL code like I did for sys_nirq1: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=134090312118873&w=2 That would avoid having to do this in both board files. I thought about adding sys_nirq2 in my patch too, but did not know how to properly test it. Kevin
{ .reg_offset = OMAP_MUX_TERMINATOR },
};