[PATCH] can: flexcan: add a regulator for transceiver

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:18:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

No, the regulator API will stub itself out if not enabled, and if the
supply is fixed then a fixed voltage regulator will do the job.  We
shouldn't be open coding this stuff in individual users.

Ah, yes.  But when you say "a fixed voltage regulator", you actually
meant dummy regulator, right?

No, I really do mean a fixed voltage regulator.  Dummy regulators should
essentially never be used in production.

 static void flexcan_transceiver_switch(const struct flexcan_priv *priv, int on)
 {
+       if (on)
+               regulator_enable(priv->reg_xcvr);
+       else
+               regulator_disable(priv->reg_xcvr);
+

So long as the stack guarantees that you won't get unbalanced calls to
this and...

+       priv->reg_xcvr = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "xcvr");

...add error checking here the code should be fine, yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120703/782081de/attachment.sig>