From: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
With the common clock framework in place, it is useful to enable
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG option, in order to easily inspect the clock tree.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
arch/arm/configs/imx_v4_v5_defconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MXC=y CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y CONFIG_IMX_SDMA=y CONFIG_IMX_DMA=y+CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT is not set # CONFIG_DNOTIFY is not set # CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR is not set
From: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
With the common clock framework in place, it is useful to enable
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG option, in order to easily inspect the clock tree.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=m CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y CONFIG_MXS_DMA=y+CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y # CONFIG_DNOTIFY is not set CONFIG_FSCACHE=m
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:35:51PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
With the common clock framework in place, it is useful to enable
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG option, in order to easily inspect the clock tree.
I'm ambiguous on this. It does look useful, but on the other hand,
I'm wondering why it hasn't been enabled by framework by default.
Sascha, what's your take on this?
Regards,
Shawn
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=m CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y CONFIG_MXS_DMA=y+CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y # CONFIG_DNOTIFY is not set CONFIG_FSCACHE=m
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:55:06AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:35:51PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
quoted
From: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
With the common clock framework in place, it is useful to enable
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG option, in order to easily inspect the clock tree.
I'm ambiguous on this. It does look useful, but on the other hand,
I'm wondering why it hasn't been enabled by framework by default.
Sascha, what's your take on this?
I also like to have debugfs support enabled in the defconfigs. I don't
know if it's desirable to enable this unconditionally when
CONFIG_DEBUGFS is enabled because I think the clk debugfs support can
have some bad influence on performance.
I think Fabios patches are fine for nor. If we decide to enable clk
debugfs support later unconditionally than all we have is two unused
lines in the defconfigs.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:25:40AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
I also like to have debugfs support enabled in the defconfigs. I don't
know if it's desirable to enable this unconditionally when
CONFIG_DEBUGFS is enabled because I think the clk debugfs support can
have some bad influence on performance.
I think Fabios patches are fine for nor. If we decide to enable clk
debugfs support later unconditionally than all we have is two unused
lines in the defconfigs.
Ok, I will queue both patches then.
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:37:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:25:40AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
quoted
I also like to have debugfs support enabled in the defconfigs. I don't
know if it's desirable to enable this unconditionally when
CONFIG_DEBUGFS is enabled because I think the clk debugfs support can
have some bad influence on performance.
I think Fabios patches are fine for nor. If we decide to enable clk
debugfs support later unconditionally than all we have is two unused
lines in the defconfigs.
Ok, I will queue both patches then.
Could you skip the imx patch? I also have some patches for the defconfig
from Fabio and I'd like to squash them together since the imx defconfig
could use a general update.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
On 5 July 2012 15:06, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:
Could you skip the imx patch? I also have some patches for the defconfig
from Fabio and I'd like to squash them together since the imx defconfig
could use a general update.