Am Montag, den 09.07.2012, 10:14 +0200 schrieb javier Martin:
[...]
quoted
quoted
+enum coda_platform {
+ CODA_INVALID = 0,
I don't think CODA_INVALID is useful.
It is, otherwise the following will fail since CODA_IMX27 is 0:
if (of_id)
dev->devtype = of_id->data;
else if (pdev_id && pdev_id->driver_data) <-----
pdev_id->driver_data = CODA_IMX27 = 0
dev->devtype = &coda_devdata[pdev_id->driver_data];
else
return -EINVAL;
Oh, right. I think it should be ok to just remove the
pdev_id->driver_data check.
Since it's all in the same source file, it's unlikely that somebody adds
a platform_device_id to coda_platform_ids array but forgets to set
the .driver_data field.
regards
Philipp