On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Please check this and talk to each other ...

I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate
patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd
really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me.
They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually
questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be
useful for a number of drivers.

Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd
prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to
support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you
think?

I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one
to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with
the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better
to do this the proper way now.

	Arnd