On 07/02/12 12:54, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Great! It looks like device_type doesn't have any list iteration support
though. Is that requirement gone?

Pretty much, yeah. I'll soon post a separate patch which removes the
get_by_name functionality (together with its related klist).

quoted

Will you resend this as part of a series? It will be easier to review then.

Not sure. There's a collection of discrete patches that I've been
posting, but they really aren't an organic series: as long as the
dependencies are met, each and every one of them is applicable even if
applied alone.

So I'd prefer (when possible) to treat patches in a discrete fashion
so we can start applying them and unblock others who depend on them
(e.g. Fernando's runtime PM work depends on this one).

But if you prefer me to send this one patch differently to make it
easier to review, let me know!

Ok then. Please add

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>

It would be nice if you got an ack from Greg or Kay on the device_type
usage too.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.