[PATCHv4 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-02 11:06:18
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Hi Marek, On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:47:27 +0200 Marek Szyprowski [off-list ref] wrote:
This patch changes dma-mapping subsystem to use generic vmalloc areas for all consistent dma allocations. This increases the total size limit of the consistent allocations and removes platform hacks and a lot of duplicated code. Atomic allocations are served from special pool preallocated on boot, becasue vmalloc areas cannot be reliably created in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 505 +++++++++++++---------------------- arch/arm/mm/mm.h | 3 + include/linux/vmalloc.h | 1 + mm/vmalloc.c | 10 +- 6 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 329 deletions(-)
......
-static int __init consistent_init(void)
-{
- int ret = 0;
- pgd_t *pgd;
- pud_t *pud;
- pmd_t *pmd;
- pte_t *pte;
- int i = 0;
- unsigned long base = consistent_base;
- unsigned long num_ptes = (CONSISTENT_END - base) >> PMD_SHIFT;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU))
- return 0;
-
- consistent_pte = kmalloc(num_ptes * sizeof(pte_t), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!consistent_pte) {
- pr_err("%s: no memory\n", __func__);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- pr_debug("DMA memory: 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx:\n", base, CONSISTENT_END);
- consistent_head.vm_start = base;
-
- do {
- pgd = pgd_offset(&init_mm, base);
-
- pud = pud_alloc(&init_mm, pgd, base);
- if (!pud) {
- pr_err("%s: no pud tables\n", __func__);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
- }
-
- pmd = pmd_alloc(&init_mm, pud, base);
- if (!pmd) {
- pr_err("%s: no pmd tables\n", __func__);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
- }
- WARN_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
-
- pte = pte_alloc_kernel(pmd, base);
- if (!pte) {
- pr_err("%s: no pte tables\n", __func__);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
- }
-
- consistent_pte[i++] = pte;
- base += PMD_SIZE;
- } while (base < CONSISTENT_END);
-
- return ret;
-}
-core_initcall(consistent_init);
-
static void *__alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, size_t size,
pgprot_t prot, struct page **ret_page);
-static struct arm_vmregion_head coherent_head = {
- .vm_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&coherent_head.vm_lock),
- .vm_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(coherent_head.vm_list),
+static void *__alloc_remap_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
+ pgprot_t prot, struct page **ret_page,
+ const void *caller);
+
+static void *
+__dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
+ const void *caller)
+{
+ struct vm_struct *area;
+ unsigned long addr;
+
+ area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
+ caller);
+ if (!area)
+ return NULL;
+ addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
+ area->phys_addr = __pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page));
+
+ if (ioremap_page_range(addr, addr + size, area->phys_addr, prot)) {
+ vunmap((void *)addr);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ return (void *)addr;
+}
The above "ioremap_page_range()" seems to be executed against normal
pages(liner kernel mapping) with setting a new prot, because pages were
passed from __dma_alloc_buffer(){..alloc_pages()...}. For me, this is
creating another page mapping with different pgprot, and it can cause
the pgprot inconsistency. This reminds me of the following old patch.
[RFC PATCH] Avoid aliasing mappings in DMA coherent allocator
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/106815.html
I think that this is why ioremap() isn't allowed with RAM.
__arm_ioremap_pfn_caller() doens't allow RAM remapping.
193 void __iomem * __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller(unsigned long pfn,
194 unsigned long offset, size_t size, unsigned int mtype, void *caller)
195 {
196 const struct mem_type *type;
197 int err;
... .
240 /*
241 * Don't allow RAM to be mapped - this causes problems with ARMv6+
242 */
243 if (WARN_ON(pfn_valid(pfn)))
244 return NULL;
...
So my question is:
1, is the above ioremap_page_range() creating another page mapping
with a new pgprot, in addition to liner mapping?
2, If so, is it safe for pgprot inconsistency from different vaddrs?
I hope that my questins are making sense.