Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2012-07-03
STALE5077d
Revisions (27)
  1. v0 [diff vs current]
  2. v0 [diff vs current]
  3. v0 [diff vs current]
  4. v0 [diff vs current]
  5. v0 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 [diff vs current]
  7. v1 [diff vs current]
  8. v1 [diff vs current]
  9. v1 [diff vs current]
  10. v1 [diff vs current]
  11. v1 [diff vs current]
  12. v1 current
  13. v1 [diff vs current]
  14. v2 [diff vs current]
  15. v2 [diff vs current]
  16. v2 [diff vs current]
  17. v2 [diff vs current]
  18. v3 [diff vs current]
  19. v3 [diff vs current]
  20. v3 [diff vs current]
  21. v3 [diff vs current]
  22. v4 [diff vs current]
  23. v4 [diff vs current]
  24. v5 [diff vs current]
  25. v5 [diff vs current]
  26. v6 [diff vs current]
  27. v7 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: support 88pm80x in 80x driver

From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2012-06-29 14:21:40

On Thursday 28 June 2012, Qiao Zhou wrote:
+       ret =
+           regmap_add_irq_chip(chip->regmap, chip->irq, flags, chip->irq_base,
+                               chip->regmap_irq_chip, &chip->irq_data);
One more question I have about this, mainly for Mark:

I understand that by passing -1 into regmap_add_irq_chip, it should allocate
its own linear irq domain rather using a legacy domain. Does that require
any other changes? Should the drivers that use the irq number just use
regmap_irq_get_virq() to get the linux irq number, or is there more to do
here?

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help