On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:

quoted

From: Felipe Balbi <redacted>

stat & BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1),

Not true. I'd guess you are missing some context in the patch
description.

See the explanation , hope I understood your concern correctly.

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg70277.html

The code may be right, but as Russell pointed out, the patch description
is very weak. I could read the mail now to understand, but I prefer to
wait for a better patch description. Because I need to ensure other
people reading the git history later will understand easily without
having to search the web.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120619/f49d51fb/attachment.sig>