On Tuesday 12 June 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:
quoted
FWIW, the board-dt.c from mach-kirkwood should just become kirkwood.c
and we might want to merge it with the kirkwood common.c file in the long
run, if any contents from that file remain for the dt version.
So, there would be an orion5x.c, dove.c as well? Or, should it be
mvebu.c to encompass all of them?
Yes, I think we should have one of those files contain the DT_MACHINE
definition for that soc type, unless they are unified to the point where
we only need one.
Arnd