ARM PCI controller registration and representation using device tree?
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2012-06-03 02:41:52
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Saturday 02 June 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I think we have to keep the existing strategy of having struct hw_pci and its pci_sys_data, registering each bus separately with its own individual swizzle and map_irq functions depending on how the bus hardware is setup.
Actually, I think we won't need to call pci_fixup_irqs for DT at all, so there won't be host specific swizzle and map_irq functions. AFAICT the interrupt-map property can handle all possible cases, it certainly does so for a large number of obscure buses on powerpc. Please have a look at drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c to see if you can spot anything missing in there. The interrupt-map lets you define a mapping from a bus-specific interrupt number to a global one, with an address/mask of the bus/dev/fn ID of the device(s) it applies to. For anything with default swizzling, we just provide the map for the root dev, while those devices that require a more complex mapping need to list each IRQ line that is connected differently. See arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts for an example with a nonstandard mapping.
Also rememer that the PCI configuration space accessor functions are highly PCI host bridge specific.
Right. We can have a default ones for mmconfig and PIO 0xcfc in drivers/pci, but I think most will have a separate one on ARM. Arnd