On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Nishanth
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:
quoted
From: Vikram Pandita <redacted>
If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
and wait on idlest.
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <redacted>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <redacted>
Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <redacted>
Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch?
Other than forwarding the patch over(since it seems to have slipped
through the fingers of folks monitoring the product trees), I have had
no other contributions to the patch.
Also, just FYI, no need to add the Cc: lines for the mailing lists in the
bottom of the patch description.
Thanks. point taken. will take care of that in future patches.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon