Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2012-05-12

[GIT PULL] Renesas ARM-based platforms updates for v3.5

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-12 20:17:14
Also in: linux-sh

On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
quoted
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi,

Please pull changes since commit d48b97b403d23f6df0b990cee652bdf9a52337a3

   Linux 3.4-rc6

with top-most commit 5658c94096c16e769203b6dea5e5f04e7ff12633

   Merge branch 'renesas-kzm9g' into renesas-soc-new

from the git repository at:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/renesas.git soc-new

to receive new Renesas ARM-based platforms material for v3.5.  Included are:

 * Urgent regression and SMP fixes (also included in the fixes branch that I've
  just sent a separate pull request for in the hope it is still possible to
  push them for v3.4).  Two of those fixes are duplicated in the renesas-sh7372
  branch, which is because I learned that they were fixes for recent
  regressions after they had gone to that branch.  Sorry about that.

 * Updates for boards based on the sh7372 and r8a7740 SoCs.

 * Support for 2 new boards, armadillo800eva and KZM-A9-GT.
Hi Rafael,

If you take a look at how the other ARM subarch maintainers organize
the patches that they feed up to us, you'll see that they group them
either per functional topic, or more commonly per subject such as
"core soc updates", "soc driver updates", "board updates", "device
tree updates", "cleanup", and so on.

That fits the model we've been having on arm-soc as well, since we
split our tree up per category like that, and send those cross-section
branches between different vendors (but same categories) up to Linus
that way.


So, would you mind taking a look at what you have in the new-soc
branch and reshuffling things a bit? Looking at the history of the
new-soc branch and the rest of the repo, it seems that you're already
more or less organizing your tree the way I am asking for, it's just
that you merged them all together before sending this pull request.
Well.

I'd prefer not to rebase any branches and move commits around if that's
what you're talking about, because I have a rule that my branches are not
rebased, except for the next one.
I will have to rebase the whole thing anyway because of the changes in
"fixes", so I think I'll just create new branches and send pull requests
again.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help