[GIT PULL] Renesas ARM-based platforms updates for v3.5
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-12 20:17:14
Also in:
linux-sh
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:quoted
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, Please pull changes since commit d48b97b403d23f6df0b990cee652bdf9a52337a3 Linux 3.4-rc6 with top-most commit 5658c94096c16e769203b6dea5e5f04e7ff12633 Merge branch 'renesas-kzm9g' into renesas-soc-new from the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/renesas.git soc-new to receive new Renesas ARM-based platforms material for v3.5. Included are: * Urgent regression and SMP fixes (also included in the fixes branch that I've just sent a separate pull request for in the hope it is still possible to push them for v3.4). Two of those fixes are duplicated in the renesas-sh7372 branch, which is because I learned that they were fixes for recent regressions after they had gone to that branch. Sorry about that. * Updates for boards based on the sh7372 and r8a7740 SoCs. * Support for 2 new boards, armadillo800eva and KZM-A9-GT.Hi Rafael, If you take a look at how the other ARM subarch maintainers organize the patches that they feed up to us, you'll see that they group them either per functional topic, or more commonly per subject such as "core soc updates", "soc driver updates", "board updates", "device tree updates", "cleanup", and so on. That fits the model we've been having on arm-soc as well, since we split our tree up per category like that, and send those cross-section branches between different vendors (but same categories) up to Linus that way. So, would you mind taking a look at what you have in the new-soc branch and reshuffling things a bit? Looking at the history of the new-soc branch and the rest of the repo, it seems that you're already more or less organizing your tree the way I am asking for, it's just that you merged them all together before sending this pull request.Well. I'd prefer not to rebase any branches and move commits around if that's what you're talking about, because I have a rule that my branches are not rebased, except for the next one.
I will have to rebase the whole thing anyway because of the changes in "fixes", so I think I'll just create new branches and send pull requests again. Thanks, Rafael