On 5/11/2012 8:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you),
are you ok to merge it in your tree ?

You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new
patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ?

IIO is still in staging from the point of view of git trees.  Hence Greg
will actually merge the patches.  Could you send him a clean set
with all the acks etc. (cc'd on this).

Thanks,
Maxime

Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :

quoted

On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

quoted

So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the
ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision,
whichever AT91 SoC they like.

Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline,
but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver.

Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it
all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the
platform data header file.

Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches.

	Arnd