[PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-03 15:18:48
On 03/05/12 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static void mmci_dt_populate_generic_pdata(struct device_node *np, + struct mmci_platform_data *pdata) +{ + int bus_width = 0; + + of_property_read_u32(np, "wp-gpios",&pdata->gpio_wp); + if (!pdata->gpio_wp) + pdata->gpio_wp = -1; + + of_property_read_u32(np, "cd-gpios",&pdata->gpio_cd); + if (!pdata->gpio_cd) + pdata->gpio_cd = -1; + + if (of_get_property(np, "cd-inverted", NULL)) + pdata->cd_invert = true; + else + pdata->cd_invert = false; + + of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency",&pdata->f_max); + if (!pdata->f_max) + pr_warn("%s has no 'max-frequency' property\n", np->full_name); + + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed", NULL)) + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED; + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-sd-highspeed", NULL)) + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; + + of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width",&bus_width); + switch (bus_width) { + case 0 : + /* No bus-width supplied. */ + break; + case 4 : + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; + break; + case 8 : + pdata->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; + break; + default : + pr_warn("%s: Unsupported bus width\n", np->full_name); + } +} +#endif + static int __devinit mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id) { struct mmci_platform_data *plat = dev->dev.platform_data; + struct device_node *np = dev->dev.of_node; struct variant_data *variant = id->data; struct mmci_host *host; struct mmc_host *mmc; - int ret; + int ret, freeplat = 0; + + /* Must have platform data or Device Tree. */ + if (!plat&& !np) { + dev_err(&dev->dev, "No plat data or DT found\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } - /* must have platform data */ if (!plat) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; + plat = kzalloc(sizeof(*plat), GFP_KERNEL);I think this will leak memory - consider what happens if the driver gets bound and unbound from the same device a number of times. How about using devm_kzalloc() instead, so that when probe fails or the driver is unbound, the memory is automatically freed? No need for that freeplat variable either...
Makes sense. Give me a few moments.
quoted
+ if (!plat) + return -ENOMEM; + freeplat = 1; } + if (np) + mmci_dt_populate_generic_pdata(np, plat); + ret = amba_request_regions(dev, DRIVER_NAME); if (ret) goto out;@@ -1448,6 +1505,9 @@ static int __devinit mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev, rel_regions: amba_release_regions(dev); out: + if (freeplat) + kfree(plat); + return ret; } --1.7.9.5
-- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog