Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 6 authors, 2012-05-14

[PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions

From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre)
Date: 2012-05-14 19:55:04
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap

On Mon, 14 May 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Salut Thomas,

Sorry for the delay.

On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
quoted
Hello Benoit,

Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200,
Benoit Cousson[off-list ref]  a ?crit :
quoted
Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT
board file. This is an intermediate step before having some
generic DT aware map_io function.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<redacted>
Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware
map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the
recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static
mappings at boot time?
Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to store that
inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-)
In general, static vs dynamic IO mappings are just some Linux 
implementation details.  This distinction does not belong in DT.


Nicolas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help