Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-05-09

[PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

From: Omar Ramirez Luna <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-09 23:48:31
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap

Hi Vaibhav,

Somehow I missed this mail.

On 2 May 2012 00:42, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Omar,

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
quoted
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.

Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you
had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is added.
I believe the cleanup needs to be there, but this is generic enough to
support DT as it is.
We probably need to decide whether the number of mailbox sub-modules
should be part of hwmod attribute or come from device tree.
All the data is currently coming from hwmod, so I don't see why this
must be split now between hwmod and DT, but I'm open for suggestions.
IMO the
static allocation of the mailboxes is better suited in the device-tree
data.
If possible I wouldn't want to tie use case specifics to DT or hwmod,
the whole point for the cleanup was to allow a dynamic mailbox
allocation and not statically assign them.

Regards,

Omar
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help