Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2012-05-25

mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init()

From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
Date: 2012-05-24 22:12:33
Also in: linux-mm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:32:56 +0900
KyongHo [off-list ref] wrote:
vmalloc_init() adds 'vmap_area's for early 'vm_struct's.
This patch fixes vmalloc_init() to correctly initialize
vmap_area for the given vm_struct.
<daily message>
Insufficient information.  When fixing a bug please always always
always describe the user-visible effects of the bug.  Does the kernel
instantly crash?  Is it a comestic cleanliness thing which has no
effect?  Something in between?  I have simply no idea, and am dependent
upon you to tell me.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1185,9 +1185,10 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
 	/* Import existing vmlist entries. */
 	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
 		va = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vmap_area), GFP_NOWAIT);
-		va->flags = tmp->flags | VM_VM_AREA;
+		va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
This change is a mystery.  Why do we no longer transfer ->flags?
 		va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
 		va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
+		va->vm = tmp;
OK, I can see how this might be important.  But why did you find it
necessary?  Why was this change actually needed?
 		__insert_vmap_area(va);
 	}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help