mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init()
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
Date: 2012-05-24 22:12:33
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
Date: 2012-05-24 22:12:33
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:32:56 +0900 KyongHo [off-list ref] wrote:
vmalloc_init() adds 'vmap_area's for early 'vm_struct's. This patch fixes vmalloc_init() to correctly initialize vmap_area for the given vm_struct.
<daily message> Insufficient information. When fixing a bug please always always always describe the user-visible effects of the bug. Does the kernel instantly crash? Is it a comestic cleanliness thing which has no effect? Something in between? I have simply no idea, and am dependent upon you to tell me.
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c@@ -1185,9 +1185,10 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void) /* Import existing vmlist entries. */ for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) { va = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vmap_area), GFP_NOWAIT); - va->flags = tmp->flags | VM_VM_AREA; + va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
This change is a mystery. Why do we no longer transfer ->flags?
va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr; va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size; + va->vm = tmp;
OK, I can see how this might be important. But why did you find it necessary? Why was this change actually needed?
__insert_vmap_area(va); }