[PATCH 1/2] gpio/generic: initialize basic_mmio_gpio shadow variables properly
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-19 05:45:33
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Grant Likely [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 15:35:02 +0800, Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
It fixes the issue in gpio-generic that commit fb14921 (gpio/mxc: add missing initialization of basic_mmio_gpio shadow variables) manged to fix in gpio-mxc driver, so that other platform specific drivers do not suffer from the same problem over and over again. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <redacted> --- ?drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c | ? ?4 ++++ ?1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c index e38dd0c..cfc9439 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c@@ -394,6 +394,10 @@ int bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc, struct device *dev,? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret; ? ? ? bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat); + ? ? if (bgc->gc.set == bgpio_set_set) + ? ? ? ? ? ? bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_set); + ? ? if (bgc->reg_dir) + ? ? ? ? ? ? bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);This assumes that the set and dir registers are actually readable which isn't the case on some hardware. ?There needs to be a mechanism for drivers using bgpio_init to control how data & dir are initialized (possibly with some flags; maybe replace the big_endian arg with a flags arg).
If you can turn it around quickly, I'll still try to get it in for v3.5 g.