Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 2 authors, 2012-05-10

[PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle driver

From: Rob Lee <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-10 14:11:21
Also in: lkml

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:27:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
quoted
Sascha,
quoted
This clk_get should go away here and be moved somewhere to
initialization. Also, if getting this clock fails we can still
do regular cpu_do_idle. Additionally, if clk_get fails, we'll
have a ERR_PTR value in gpc_dvfs_clk in which case the
gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL won't trigger next time you are here and
then you'll enable a nonexisting clock below.
Agree. ?I'd prefer to enable this clock during intialization and just
leave it running. ?It is supposed to be a very low power clock and I
couldn't measuring any power difference with and without it being
enabled
Ok, even better.
quoted
quoted
I wonder why you don't add the default ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE_PWR state.
The above is something different, right? It has a greater exit latency
than ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE_PWR, so why don't we add it here aswell?
Yes and no. ?Yes this is a different state but no, it doesn't have a
significantly greater exit latency, or at least a large enough exit
latency to warrant an extra state in my opinion. ?According to the
i.MX5 documentation, the extra exit time beyond basic WFI required for
the ?"WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF" state is 500ns (this is due to a
difference in i.MX5 hardware implementation compared to all other ARM
platforms). ?In reality, it did require a few more microseconds to
perform in my testing just based on the extra register writes in
mx5_cpu_lp_set(). ?I'd like to clean up mx5_cpu_lp_set() and add a
global variable to track the previous state and to just exit out if
the new state is the same as the old.
Do you think it's worth it? You buy skipping the read with an additional
test.
I'll run some tests to check.

Thanks,
Rob
quoted
I could do this cleanup as part of this patchset if you prefer that.
Yes please. Cleanups before adding new features is always a good reason
to apply a patch series ;)

Sascha

--
Pengutronix e.K. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
Industrial Linux Solutions ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | http://www.pengutronix.de/ ?|
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 ? ?|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 ? ? ? ? ? | Fax: ? +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help