"J, KEERTHY" [off-list ref] writes:

Hi AnilKumar,

Thanks for reviewing.

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:35, J, KEERTHY wrote:

quoted

From: Jean Pihet <redacted>

Change the name field value to better reflect the smartreflex
integration in the system.

Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>
Signed-off-by: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | ? ?8 ++++----
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?2 +-
?2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
index 144d118..15907b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c

@@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_mpu_irqs[] = {

?};

?static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
- ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sr1",
+ ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
? ? ? .class ? ? ? ? ?= &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
? ? ? .main_clk ? ? ? = "sr1_fck",
? ? ? .prcm ? ? ? ? ? = {

@@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {

?};

?static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr1_hwmod = {
- ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sr1",
+ ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
? ? ? .class ? ? ? ? ?= &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
? ? ? .main_clk ? ? ? = "sr1_fck",
? ? ? .prcm ? ? ? ? ? = {

@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_core_irqs[] = {

?};

?static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
- ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sr2",
+ ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "smartreflex_core",
? ? ? .class ? ? ? ? ?= &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
? ? ? .main_clk ? ? ? = "sr2_fck",
? ? ? .prcm ? ? ? ? ? = {

@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {

?};

?static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr2_hwmod = {
- ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sr2",
+ ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "smartreflex_core",
? ? ? .class ? ? ? ? ?= &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
? ? ? .main_clk ? ? ? = "sr2_fck",
? ? ? .prcm ? ? ? ? ? = {

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
index 2edd1e2..d859277 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c

@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)

? ? ? ? ? ? ? sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
- ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "smartreflex_mpu_iva"))) {

What if voltage rail is different for mpu and iva? I have seen some devices
supports SmartReflex have different voltage rails for mpu and iva.

I get the point. OMAP3 iva and mpu have a common rail. OMAP4 onwards
even we have different rails for mpu and iva. I will enhance the checks here.

Rather than enhancing the checks, this SoC specific data should probably
just be made part of the SoC specific hwmod dev_attr.

Kevin